If you're really up for it Dan, us ♥ consistency.

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:24 PM, John LaBanca <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think we currently only use package-info.java when we need it.
>
> Thanks,
> John LaBanca
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Daniel Rice (דניאל רייס) <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>>  I'm wiling to switch everything over to package-info.java.  FYI,
>> right now I see only 12 instances of package-info.java.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:59 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > We have been using package-info.java instead, where we can also use
>> > annotations and get refactoring support.  Why do we want to switch?
>> >
>> >
>> > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1027801/show
>> >
>>
>
>  --
> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to