On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:49 PM, <kpro...@google.com> wrote: > LGTM, but please note my comments... > > SOYC is becoming smart!! One thing I'm wondering is whether we have a > good way of making sure we still get the right information everywhere > (the smarter it gets, the harder it gets to follow in some sense, e.g., > one-character function names, etc.). There's SoycTest, but when I wrote > it, it was pretty empty (just checking for the existence of a file or > two). Do you think medium term it would be worth it to add some tests > to that to make sure we're getting the right entries in the different > categories?
I forgot to answer this. I agree an automated test would be good. I don't have any great ideas on how to do it, but here are some thoughts: - load a report page in HTML unit and start walking the DOM - perform some sort of automated broken link analysis on the report. filed an issue http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5697 -- Eric Z. Ayers Google Web Toolkit, Atlanta, GA USA -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
