If Dave has already LGTM'd one of the approaches as maven friendly, is there any reason not to go with that? What are the trade offs?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Rodrigo Chandia <[email protected]>wrote: > El 11 de febrero de 2011 13:19, Nick Chalko <[email protected]> escribió: > > >> >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Rodrigo Chandia <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Oh, sorry. I guess I pasted confusingly similar links. So far there are >>> two approaches to fix Issue 5950: >>> >>> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1323803/show (This one) >>> >>> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1342803/show (The other one) >>> >>> >>> >> So adding to gwt-user seems like the simplest approach >> > > Correct, but doing so could cause problems for someone trying to use their > own validation classes (say version 1.0.1-GA with a small bug fix), right? > That is why Ray commented above that this approach could bring Maven wrath > upon us. I tried our expenses sample with Maven and Eclipse, but that as far > as I can go with Maven given my lack of Maven-fu (white belt still). > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
