Actually, it does work. On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Kelly Norton <[email protected]> wrote: > I could be wrong, but I don't think the xsiframe linker is going to work > here. > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Kelly Norton <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> xsiframe is fine if it works. But you'll have to check it because these >> are not the normal xs restrictions. >> >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Unnur Gretarsdottir <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> All google3 projects are being switched to xsiframe in a few weeks >>> (currently blocked by lack of a Blaze push). Deprecation/deletions of >>> other linkers for regular GWT will soon follow, but to be honest, will >>> be a GWT 3.0 thing at the very earliest. >>> >>> It's not a burning issue, but I do recommend that you do not switch to >>> the xs linker at this point. It doesn't install in an iframe, and >>> switching from being iframe installed vs. not has proven painful for >>> some teams. Right now - if you're using the std linker (default), >>> your compliant with being installed in an iframe, so if you start >>> using xs, pick up some code dependencies that assume non-iframe, and >>> then need to switch back to iframe based (xsiframe), you may see some >>> issues. Or maybe not.... >>> >>> It's also possible that xs does not support DevMode - I can't remember >>> off the top of my head. If you care about that, then xsiframe >>> definitely does support it. >>> >>> - Unnur >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:09 PM, John Tamplin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Chris Conroy <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Sorry, didn't see your comment in time for the commit. I just used the >>> >> same fix Kelly applied in SpeedTracer. I don't think it really matters >>> >> strongly either way. >>> > >>> > As I understand it, the xs linker will soon be deprecated since the >>> > xsiframe >>> > linker provides a superset of its functionality. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > John A. Tamplin >>> > Software Engineer (GWT), Google >>> > >> >> >> >> -- >> If you received this communication by mistake, you are entitled to one >> free ice cream cone on me. Simply print out this email including all >> relevant SMTP headers and present them at my desk to claim your creamy >> treat. We'll have a laugh at my emailing incompetence, and play a game of >> ping pong. (offer may not be valid in all States). >> > > > > -- > If you received this communication by mistake, you are entitled to one free > ice cream cone on me. Simply print out this email including all relevant > SMTP headers and present them at my desk to claim your creamy treat. We'll > have a laugh at my emailing incompetence, and play a game of ping pong. > (offer may not be valid in all States). > >
-- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
