Does the new IE9 value for user.agent imply yet another permutation? We should really avoid that if we can, and so far it sounds like it might not be needed. Can we introduce IE9 without causing a new hard perm?
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:07 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Mostly LGTM > > Needs a unit test for property fallback behavior. > > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1369807/ > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
