2011/3/21 Scott Blum <[email protected]>: > I seem to recall at one point we actually put some thought into not having > super interfaces have a superClass field at all, and just always have the > compiler implicitly assume Object. Not sure where that idea went, or why we > ended up not doing that.
That was exactly the behaviour I was expecting from GWT. It's not something I'll be pushing any further but if that idea brought again you've got another reason to implement it. As for now I'll remember to always check my assumptions using automated tests. -- Grzegorz Kossakowski -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
