Hi,
Poking around a bit more I found that gwtc seems to assume internally
that whenever type name contains '$' it's in "binary form" and if it
doesn't contain dollar sign then it can be considered to be in "source
form". It's worth noting (and it's admitted in gwtc's internals) that
this condition doesn't split of all type names into disjoint union of
two respective sets.
Anyway, my question is: how much of gwt internals rely on this
distinction? I noticed that gwtc is doing handful number of
conversions between those two forms. This is particularly problematic
for my work because jribble can have dollar sign in it's type name and
this would be extremely hard to change.
Also, it looks like Java allows type names containing dollar sign:
mac-grek:javajunk grek$ echo 'class A$B {}' > A\$B.java
mac-grek:javajunk grek$ javac 'A$B.java'
mac-grek:javajunk grek$ javap 'A$B'
Compiled from "A$B.java"
class A$B extends java.lang.Object{
A$B();
}
Is gwtc handling those cases in pure java environment properly?
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
