It's not called out in the gwt guidelines, but I don't think I'm giving away any secrets by saying 80/100 is the Google convention. On May 31, 2011 6:21 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > I wasn't able to find that in the style guide or discussion when it was > changed. 80 code / 100 comments feels inconsistent. > > > On 2011/05/29 23:06:55, zundel wrote: >> Leaving comments at 80 was intentional as per the style guide, I > thought. >> On May 29, 2011 6:43 PM, <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: >> > Reviewers: zundel, rjrjr, >> > >> > Description: >> > Format comments to 100 columns to match code format >> > >> > >> > Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450808/ >> > >> > Affected files: >> > M eclipse/settings/code-style/gwt-format.xml >> > >> > >> > Index: eclipse/settings/code-style/gwt-format.xml >> > =================================================================== >> > --- eclipse/settings/code-style/gwt-format.xml (revision 10241) >> > +++ eclipse/settings/code-style/gwt-format.xml (working copy) >> > @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ >> > <setting > id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.indent_root_tags" >> > value="true"/> >> > <setting >> > > > id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.insert_new_line_before_root_tags" > >> > value="insert"/> >> > <setting >> > > id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.insert_new_line_for_parameter" >> > value="do not insert"/> >> > -<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.line_length" >> > value="80"/> >> > +<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.line_length" >> > value="100"/> >> > <setting >> > > id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.new_lines_at_block_boundaries" >> > value="true"/> >> > <setting >> > > > id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.new_lines_at_javadoc_boundaries" >> > value="true"/> >> > <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.compact_else_if" >> value="true"/> >> > >> > > > > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450808/
-- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
