[gwt-contrib] Re: I don't believe in magic, but as Scott points out, there are consistent (issue1453804)

[conroy]

On 2011/06/08 02:25:30, zundel wrote:

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:13 PM, <mailto:sco...@google.com> wrote:

>
>
>

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1453804/diff/1017/dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/lang/LongLibTestBase.java

> File dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/lang/LongLibTestBase.java (right):
>
>
>

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1453804/diff/1017/dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/lang/LongLibTestBase.java#newcode23

> dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/lang/LongLibTestBase.java:23: /**
> If we're going by that logic...
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=compiler+magic
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_%28programming)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_magic_%28programming)
>
> :P
>
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1453804/
>

I've you'd like to submit a patching changing all appropriate mentions

of

"magic" to "compiler magic", I'll be happy to review it :P

--
Eric Z. Ayers
Google Web Toolkit, Atlanta, GA USA

relevant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o89iKsKw19M

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1453804/

--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors