The article is a poor source if one attempts to make a meaningful techincal assesment on any opinion. Sure theres a lot of buzzwords but almiost no technically minded examples to back any of the assumptions. Does it show you why X is better than Y at attempting Z. No, so what your basically left is the bias of the authors. Given the share number of technologies covered it is by definition impossible that the authors have really spent sufficient time with each in order to get confortable, become knowledgable and effective with each. On the other hand, it shows that they probably did try many or all for an afternoon and first impressions show in the lack of detail given. This article is perfect for managers while someone who really wants to get something done will after reading the article have gained little benefit from the experience.
-- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
