Hi, It looks like JSNI refs can be either source names or binary names?
I found a gwt-contrib discussion from 2009, talking deprecating anonymous inner classes in JNSI [1], and John tangentially mentioned it'd be nice to just pick one of source or binary names in JSNI refs for the 1.6 release. I agree, especially if the choice was binary names. It would make some things in the name mangling fix nicer as binary names are easily converted to internal names and, in general, less ambiguous than source names. Did that decision ever happen? ...would it be an option on the table if not? Thanks, Stephen [1]http://markmail.org/message/hgz2tra7i4qozj7r#query:+page:1+mid:nw3uuu7a3abh2ob2+state:results -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
