On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:03 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > That's it. I'd probably call the client class JsoTypedArray so it's > harder to mix it up with shared.TypedArray (particularly when you use > facilities provided by your IDE to automatically insert the 'import' > clauses). Also, giving the client class a slightly uglier name is an > incentive to rather code against the interface: the implementation class > is a detail.
I disagree -- with this approach, I can't write shared code that creates an ArrayBuffer/etc. Let me get my proof of concept code uploaded and show you what I am thinking of. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
