Hi Unnur, This is a regression of code that works in 2.3 and 2.4. But we were able to implement a workaround based on the suggestions in the bug report.
Jim. On Thursday, October 25, 2012 5:08:08 PM UTC-7, unnurg wrote: > > Hi Adam - > I'm sorry, but we were only considering immediate regressions (so > stuff that worked in 2.4 and broke in 2.5) for the 2.5 RC2 -> 2.5 > Final cherrypick list (we did add some patches that fixed older > problems, but they were patches that were small and ready to go, not > bug fix requests), and we also closed the door on new requests/issues > on Monday morning (at some point, we just have to draw the line and > get it out). > > - Unnur > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Adam Hawthorne > <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > Hi Unnur, > > > > We just discovered that > > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7628severely > > breaks our application; is a fix for this a possibility for 2.5.0-final? > > > > For a little bit of background, we have a large number of high-level > command > > objects that may return data. The web application requests using RPC > and > > the server responds with these commands. When the client completes the > > commands, it can send responses back to the server with its next > request. > > These responses share a common parameterized superclass that holds a > value > > of that type. Each subclass specifies a concrete type to the type > > parameter. > > > > What we initially found to be a problem was a class 'IntArrayResponse > > extends Response<ArrayList<Integer>> '. If the ArrayList had any > elements, > > we receive the RPC error. It might be possible to specify the value in > each > > subclass, but we haven't yet verified that. > > > > Thanks for your response, > > > > Adam > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, unnurg <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Guys - > >> We are going to be pushing the 2.5 RC2 (plus 1-2 minor cherrypicks) > to > >> Final next week - if there are any problems, please let me > >> ([email protected] <javascript:>) know before Monday morning. Note > that "problems" > >> includes only regressions - so stuff that worked in 2.4 and is now > broken in > >> 2.5. > >> > >> Thanks everyone! > >> - Unnur > >> > >> -- > >> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Adam Hawthorne > > Software Architect > > BASIS International Ltd. > > www.basis.com > > +1.505.938.6169 Phone > > +1.505.750.4128 Direct > > > > -- > > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > > > > -- > DO NOT FORWARD > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
