On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:25 PM, David <david.no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not that I have anything of authority here, but why not adopt Guice > instead of all the gwt.xml trickery and call it the Guicy Web ToolKit I don't believe Guice can 100% replicate the functionality provided by .gwt.xml files, though reducing how often developers need to manually write .gwt.xml files is something we're interested in. Having a separate config file for managing how GWT builds work is also likely going to be important to optimizing GWT compile time. If the config format were something turing complete like Java source code, then improving the GWT compiler becomes a lot more difficult. -- -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
