On Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:19:37 PM UTC+2, Jens wrote: > > How would soft permutations work if you have browser version specific JS > hacks/workarounds implemented during JJS compilation? If you have a > workaround for IE6 and a different one for IE7 and you can't mix both, > then you are probably in trouble, aren't you? I don't know if that's just a > theoretical question or if this case actually exists in todays JJS > compiler. I was just wondering about it as I always thought that soft > permutations only work well for deferred binding and hard permutations can > have the potential to be compiled totally different by the compiler.
It's not theoretical. There are things done for IE6/IE7 (always interning strings, splitting big blocks into smaller, nested ones) and others for WebKit (rewriting ">>"; but this one already accounts fro soft perms), and possibly a few other things done (or not) depending on properties (not configuration-properties, so they could be different per permutation). I have no idea how soft perms work in this case. -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
