Not specific to WebGL but for anything becomes part of the GWT core, we want it to first evolve and 'be proven' as a 3rd party library first (when it is feasible).
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Alberto Mancini <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > hope this is the right list for this discussion. > > WebGL is today supported at least by FF and, according to > http://caniuse.com/webgl, also the next release of IE will support it so > I wonder if > should GWT support WebGL (without Elemental). > > As i see in previous mails in this group, and in other GWT related groups, > the direction of the community is to move code 'out' of the core > but in my opinion the support of browser-related-features has to be > provided by GWT and not by external libraries, comments ? > > Elemental seems to me the right place where to have non-so-standard > features but supporting just chrome is not enough and I can't imagine alone > the work needed to > extend it to ff & co. > I remember a post, that I cannot find anymore actually, about extending > Elemental to support at least ff, there is any work in that direction or > is better to leave generating-code-from-webidl just for chrome ? > > > Thank you, > Alberto > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
