On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 1:47:06 PM UTC+1, Jens wrote: > > I do not believe this is correct - I am pretty sure Oracle's license is >> incompatible with Apache2 by design. In general GWT does not use any JRE >> code from Oracle, and instead uses code from Harmony or implements it from >> scratch. >> > IANAL but code from https://github.com/ThreeTen/threeten had a liberal license IIUC.
> Interesting. Glad I am not a lawyer but I am just curious how GWT deals > with code that is so easy that you can not implement it differently than > Oracle when super sourcing it. Removing/changing JavaDoc is probably not > enough to justify changing the license header from x to Google? For example > take Cloneable, ClassCastException and similar simple classes/interfaces. > Remember the Oracle/Google case about Android vs. Java? Redux: APIs are not copyrightable and "obvious implementations" are not an issue. -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
