On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Colin Alworth <niloc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What's the current thinking on removing ImageResource.isStandalone from > 2.6.0 final, as in the https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/5504/review? > Thomas added ImageResource.isStandalone several months ago (between 2.5.1 and 2.6.0), and it's been the longest outstanding patch for us [Google] to merge for internal customers. We have a surprisingly large amount of internal code that implements ImageResource, and adding a new method to the interface broke all of those users. As an interim solution, Goktug proposed we restructure things so the same change Thomas wanted is possible, but without making it into a breaking change for 2.6.0. It isn't in GWT 2.5.x, and isn't in master, but is present in both > 2.6.0-rc1 and 2. If it was an oversight to add this the first time around, > shouldn't it be dropped from 2.6 before it goes final? > Yep, I plan to cut a new rc3 today. Aside from that, seems to be passing all our smoke tests so far, will have > more comprehensive results tomorrow. > Cool, thanks for testing! -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
