BTW, my implementation of GWT.jsni() with rebinding methods was just to
show the power of the proposal, not to support the inclusion of the method.
El martes, 17 de diciembre de 2013 09:28:25 UTC-3, Andrés Testi escribió:
>
> Honestly, I think JSNI should be fully removed from GWT, even GWT.jsni().
> JsInterop seems to cover all the JS binding cases, I can't see where JSNI
> is still useful. JSNI is a dirty hack, it doesn't supports refactoring nor
> typesafe and it's not really Java. In the other hand, a thing like
> GWT.debugger() is ugly. It could be useful in JS development, but it
> doesn't differs so much from Window.alert("Hi bro, I'm debugging the line
> 123"). We already have a debugger, who needs a debugger statement? GWT.*
> methods are usually intrusive and source of code coupling.
> That said, I see the need of method rebinding only at JavaToSimplerJava
> level. JavaToJavaScript should be orthogonal, and fully covered by
> JsInterop.
>
> Of course, I'm really interested in enhance code generation. :-)
>
> - Andrés Testi
>
>
> El lunes, 16 de diciembre de 2013 17:51:15 UTC-3, Goktug Gokdogan escribió:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Andrés Testi <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Well, there is a sample for String.format() in the prototype:
>>> https://github.com/andrestesti/gwt-rebindingmethods/blob/master/samples/hellorebinding/src/com/google/gwt/sample/hellorebinding/client/util/Strings.java#L39
>>> I agree, method rebinding should eliminate the need of magic methods and
>>> simplify the compiler. GWT.debugger() is a controvesial case because Java
>>> doesn't has a semantically equivalent for it..
>>>
>>
>> Yes, that is also true for the GWT.jsni case. I think at the end there
>> should be 2 types of rewriters; one for java and one for javascript and
>> they should do real method replacement. Developer can choose either one.
>>
>> It looks like you are really interested in this. Can you also improve
>> your proposal with real method rewriting?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> - Andrés Testi
>>>
>>>
>>> El lunes, 16 de diciembre de 2013 16:48:52 UTC-3, Goktug Gokdogan
>>> escribió:
>>>>
>>>> I actually implemented with simple eval for demonstration purposes but
>>>> probably yours is preferable :)
>>>>
>>>> Yes, GWT.jsni is one of the use cases for method rebinding; that was
>>>> something I was discussing as part of the original discussion.
>>>>
>>>> In reality GWT.jsni is better to be implementable without "native"
>>>> method definitions so we could eventually take native methods out of the
>>>> compiler.
>>>> There are also other use cases like String.format, GWT.debugger and
>>>> GWT.create itself. The ideal solution should cover all to avoid redundant
>>>> features in the SDK.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Andrés Testi <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This morning I read the Goktug's slides and was surprised by the
>>>>> GWT.jsni() method. It is a nice use case for rebinding methods. I just
>>>>> added a version of GWT.jsni() to HelloRebinding sample, implementing it
>>>>> as
>>>>> a rebinding method (no compiler mods). It took me just 30 minutes of
>>>>> coding
>>>>> to add an extension to support this:
>>>>>
>>>>> JsniUtil.jsni("$wnd.alert(#)", message);
>>>>>
>>>>> - Usage: https://github.com/andrestesti/gwt-
>>>>> rebindingmethods/blob/master/samples/hellorebinding/src/
>>>>> com/google/gwt/sample/hellorebinding/client/MainWidget.java#L65
>>>>>
>>>>> - Definition: https://github.com/andrestesti/gwt-
>>>>> rebindingmethods/blob/master/samples/hellorebinding/src/
>>>>> com/google/gwt/sample/hellorebinding/client/util/JsniUtil.java#L38
>>>>>
>>>>> - Generator: https://github.com/andrestesti/gwt-
>>>>> rebindingmethods/blob/master/samples/hellorebinding/src/
>>>>> com/google/gwt/sample/hellorebinding/rebind/
>>>>> JsniSnippetGenerator.java#L32
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Andrés Testi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribe@
>>>>> googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected]
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>
>>
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
