Unfortunately the chances that I get it done in a timely manner is very slim.
When I get some time I'm going to try setting up a windows port of curl and see if that will make it so I can easily commit patches at home. On Friday, June 27, 2014 12:56:06 PM UTC-4, Daniel Kurka wrote: > > Hi Patrick, > > do you mind sending a patch for gwt-site? > > (Let me know if you need any help..) > > -Daniel > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Patrick M. Tucker < > [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > >> There are still links on the gwtproject.org site that point to the old >> code. For example: >> >> http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideMvpActivitiesAndPlaces.html >> look for the mobilewebapp link >> >> >> >> On Sunday, June 22, 2014 8:53:42 PM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> When we moved from SVN at code.google.com to Git at gwt.googlesource.com, >>> I wanted to keep the SVN repo alive because there are many links to source >>> files from blogs or sites like StackOverflow (I'm responsible for many of >>> them). >>> >>> In the last few days however, I've seen many people linking to code in >>> the SVN repo's trunk rather than the Git repo's master. >>> >>> I think this partly comes from the fact that the SVN repo is still >>> linked to from https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/ “To browse >>> the GWT source code, visit the 'Source >>> <http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source>' tab.” >>> I've asked several time that this link be fixed but it's still not been >>> done. It should link to https://code.google.com/p/ >>> google-web-toolkit/wiki/Source?tm=4 instead (what the Sources tab >>> actually links to) >>> >>> I'd also like to replace all files in the SVN trunk (not tags or release >>> branches, only trunk) with dummy content pointing to >>> gwt.googlesource.com. Something like: >>> >>> Source code for the GWT project has moved to >>> https://gwt.googlesource.com >>> >>> The file you're looking for can be now found at >>> https://gwt.googlesource.com/gwt/+/master/path/fo/file.java if it's not >>> been deleted or renamed since then. >>> >>> >>> Specifically, I don't want to just delete the "trunk" *branch* from the >>> SVN as that would break too many links. The "redirect" somehow "breaks" >>> navigation (and particularly linking to a specific line in the file), but >>> at least it's better than a plain 404. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Note: because I don't have commit rights to the SVN (maybe we could open >>> that now that we no longer sync' from the Google repo?), I'll do a script >>> that replaces the content for all the files in trunk, along with setting >>> the mime type to text/plain, for someone else to run. Either that, or >>> someone gives me the commit rights, after reviewing the script. >>> >> > > > -- > Google Germany GmbH > *Dienerstr. 12* > *80331 München* > > Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg > Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/dcfd0054-4480-4da8-b43c-c0dfb76a8c3e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
