I like your change. I think having this allows for easier transition to a more favorable facet pattern down the road.
On Tuesday, July 1, 2014 6:36:31 AM UTC-7, Manuel Carrasco Moñino wrote: > > Following the discussion here: > https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/8150/2 > > What do you guys think about changing the way of how embedded jetty class > loader works? > > Options: > - leave it as current: a bunch of hacks to load certain classes at first > - modify it to use the standard way: first WEB-INF/lib then classpath > - a mix of both, so as the default is #2 but we maintain a flag for using > #1 > - more... ? > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/e95fa2d1-c3e7-4af5-b0fb-0532001f0163%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
