Hello John,

could you please clarify if the issue was fixed or not? I have have the 
same error in 2.7. Is it related to gxt or not?



среда, 1 октября 2014 г., 23:08:31 UTC+2 пользователь John Stalcup написал:
>
> We have a short list of issues that have to be addressed before 2.7 RC, 
> and this is on the list.
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Julien Dramaix <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> I confirm, I just add GXT to one of my test project and I'm not able to 
>> use sdm anymore:
>>          [ERROR] Current binding properties are expanding to more than 
>> one permutation but per-file compilation requires that each compile operate 
>> on only one permutation.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Colin Alworth <[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> The 'test runner' in this case is just the name of a regular module 
>>> file, which happens to be used for running lots of tests, most of which 
>>> look like EntryPoints. Nothing too magic going on here, and I've gotten 
>>> this error by running modules for more 'normal' gwt apps as well, typically 
>>> when I stop SDM, restart it, and then refresh the browser or click Compile 
>>> without first using the SDM off bookmarklet.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'm not completely aware of your configuration but... it appears that 
>>>> you're using incremental compiles from a test runner, and this test runner 
>>>> isn't restricting the permutations to just 1. And that is being caught by 
>>>> an assertion.
>>>>
>>>> You can fix this by adding some <set-property> tags to your test 
>>>> .gwt.xml files.
>>>>
>>>> I hadn't thought of this use case, so I'm not sure if it's fair to tell 
>>>> people to restrict their permutation or if we need to find a better way. 
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Does this mean that we expect all projects to already be confined to one 
>>> permutation, either via set-property or collapse-all-permutations? Is there 
>>> no way to achieve that synthetically?
>>>
>>> Further, does this mean that one cannot test in multiple browsers 
>>> simultaneously, for example re-compiling in FF until some behavior is 
>>> satisfactory, then moving to Chrome (at least without stopping and 
>>> restarting SDM)? 
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected] 
>>> <javascript:>.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/cdf99604-44c9-41b5-9cca-4f45227a3c89%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/cdf99604-44c9-41b5-9cca-4f45227a3c89%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "GWT Contributors" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D6fovE52iouAswSHFpQ8dp1sLZYDTUmqBD--bhtvC0akg%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D6fovE52iouAswSHFpQ8dp1sLZYDTUmqBD--bhtvC0akg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/9f2df599-8c4b-47dd-b41e-ba3b96afc3cf%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to