Hey, I actually also thought about that in the past but never had time to implement it. You can read my thoughts at https://groups.google.com/d/msg/codehaus-mojo-gwt-maven-plugin-users/tSI4ZqjNZD8/uMt0TMHW2sUJ
Basically instead of @Asynchonize I would have used @RemoteService as that matches the "old" interface name you currently have to extend. Also I would have introduced a @GenerationStrategy annotation because in the Async interface you can return void, Request or RequestBuilder which allows you to customize the request or even cancel it. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/2705daf8-bd6a-4eee-9d20-5b325d9e58b7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
