There are no var args support yet to ease this so you need to multiple
arguments as Cristiano suggested.
However you can do some bridging to keep look/work nicer.
interface VarArgFunction {
public Object call(Event event, Object..params) {
}
class VarArgConverterFunction {
VarArgFunction delegate;
VarArgConverterFunction(VarArgFunction delegate) { this.delegate =
delegate; }
@Override
public Object call(Event event, Object param1, Object param2, Object
param3) {
return delegate.call(event, new Object[] { param1, param2, param3 );
}
}
You can also do similar bridging in javascript in a more generic way.
function(e) {
delegateFunction.call(e, Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1));
}
PS: Note that in the first solution params.length will be incorrect and
might be better better if you prune null params while the second javascript
baed solution should be ok;
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Cristiano <cristiano.costant...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I think you could try to use a class annotated with @JsType, both for
> return type and arguments...
>
> if you pass in jQuery an object like this json:
> { "key1": "value1", "key2": "value2"}
>
> and your code is
> public MyObject call(Event event, MyObject param1, MyObject param2) { ... }
>
> with a MyObject class like this :
>
> @JsType
> public class MyObject {
> public String key1;
> public String key2;
> }
>
> it should work.
> The concept is that you'll rather have to manage potential runtime issue!
> No compile time type checking will prevent you to invoke the function from
> jquery with invalid type of the parameter...
>
> I'm still exploring JsInterop so please correct me if I am wrong ;)
>
> Cristiano
>
>
>
> Il giorno venerdì 25 settembre 2015 23:33:33 UTC+2, Cristian Rinaldi ha
> scritto:
>>
>> Hey:
>>
>> I'm using JsInterop to map some JS APIs.
>> What is the best way to map a callback to receive multiple parameters?
>>
>> For example, a jQuery click handler: function (event, params)
>>
>> In Java could be:
>>
>> Function fn = new Function() {
>> @Override
>> public Object call(Event event, Object... params) {
>> setVisible(!visible);
>> return null;
>> }
>>
>>
>> but then is complicated to manipulate the "Object []", there is a more
>> direct way?
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GWT Contributors" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/006c06dd-9c64-4dbe-a3b9-b08be4d2f506%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/006c06dd-9c64-4dbe-a3b9-b08be4d2f506%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA1ULhDTeaznS%3DM53RbCg-d2kXrSV8jJtLu0PrFv8kPN_w%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
