Oh my, I totally missed 
this: 
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/q/Iaef14e17716e0f4784a466361db13930f887c996
 
(forgot actually, as I apparently commented on it)
So yes, gwt-codeserver is actually useless starting with GWT 2.7.0-rc1.

On Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 9:48:15 AM UTC+2, Cristiano wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I was asking myself when I should use the gwt-codeserver.jar
> I'm not including it into my project but I can run Super Dev Mode anyway, 
> so I've checked the content of the gwt-codeserver.jar to see what it does 
> provide that is not provided by gwt-dev:
>
> Handwritten:gwt-0.0.0 cristcost$ pwd
> /Users/cristcost/dev/Open-Source/gwt-trunk/build/staging/gwt-0.0.0
> Handwritten:gwt-0.0.0 cristcost$ *unzip -l gwt-codeserver.jar*
> Archive:  gwt-codeserver.jar
>   Length     Date   Time    Name
>  --------    ----   ----    ----
>         0  10-05-15 10:39   META-INF/
>       157  10-05-15 10:39   META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>         0  10-05-15 10:39   com/
>         0  10-05-15 10:39   com/google/
>         0  10-05-15 10:39   com/google/gwt/
>         0  10-05-15 10:39   com/google/gwt/dev/
>         0  10-05-15 10:39   *com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver*/
>      8425  10-05-15 10:39   *com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/*
> CodeServer.class
> *[...omissis...]*
>      2492  06-30-15 09:52   *com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver*
> /stub.nocache.js
>       122  10-05-15 10:39   META-INF/INDEX.LIST
>  --------                   -------
>    509150                   122 files
> Handwritten:gwt-0.0.0 cristcost$ 
>
> everything is inside the folder *com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver* , ok, 
> let's compare with dev:
>
> Handwritten:gwt-0.0.0 cristcost$ unzip -l *gwt-dev.jar* 
> com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/*
> Archive:  gwt-dev.jar
>   Length     Date   Time    Name
>  --------    ----   ----    ----
>         0  10-05-15 10:39   com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/
>      8425  10-05-15 10:39   com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/CodeServer.class
> *[...omissis...]*
>      2492  06-30-15 09:52   com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/stub.nocache.js
>  --------                   -------
>    *508871*                   *115 files*
> Handwritten:gwt-0.0.0 cristcost$ 
>
>
> and now let's filter more with more precision gwt-codeserver.jar to 
> compare the differences:
>
> Handwritten:gwt-0.0.0 cristcost$ unzip -l *gwt-codeserver.jar* 
> com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/*
> Archive:  gwt-codeserver.jar
>   Length     Date   Time    Name
>  --------    ----   ----    ----
>         0  10-05-15 10:39   com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/
>      8425  10-05-15 10:39   com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/CodeServer.class
> *[...omissis...]*
>      2492  06-30-15 09:52   com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/stub.nocache.js
>  --------                   -------
>    *508871*                   *115 files*
> Handwritten:gwt-0.0.0 cristcost$ 
>
>
> same number of files, same size, so gwt-codeserver.jar I think this is not 
> coincidence and then codeserver is completely included in gwt-dev.
> So, is useless?
> What is the purpose of it?
>
> thanks,
> Cristiano
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/6600c0ae-25f8-4652-85fc-45266c692ad1%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to