That's not fixed yet. Should be fixed before RC1. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Ümit Seren <[email protected]> wrote:
> I guess I can't put native JsInterop classes and interfaces in Java > Collections ? > I get a ClassCastException and I checked the official JsInterop > documentation and couldn't find anthing about that ? > > > On Saturday, November 21, 2015 at 5:02:13 AM UTC+1, Goktug Gokdogan wrote: >> >> dramaix@ is writing such a tool; that's how we are planning to generate >> Elemental2. >> >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Slava Pankov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> And it would be nice to generate java code with new jsinterop >>> annotations based on typescript d.ts files. Dart team is going to implement >>> such tool, probably it can be adopted for GWT as well: >>> https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/24874 >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 10:15:35 AM UTC-8, Goktug Gokdogan >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Instead of JsArray, you can use Object[] or JsType[] (will be ready by >>>> 2.8), instead of Integer, you can Double (in 2.8 release, Double exactly >>>> maps to number in javascript). >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Paul Stockley <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We wrote our own RPC mechanism that is based entirely on JSON, mainly >>>>> for performance reasons on mobile. The client works with JS Overlay >>>>> representation of the server DTO objects. We have a tool that >>>>> automatically >>>>> generates the JSO's, Looking at the new interop spec's it would be really >>>>> nice for the client and server to work with the same Java DTO objects. I >>>>> can see how most of it could work with the new system. However, we handle >>>>> Java object representations for ints, doubles, booleans and also >>>>> enumerations by generating code in the JSO's such as : >>>>> >>>>> public class ContractDoJSO extends PersistentDataObjectBaseJSO { >>>>> >>>>> protected ContractDoJSO() {} >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> public final native ContractType getContractTypeDv() /*-{ >>>>> >>>>> return (this.contractTypeDv == null) ? null : >>>>> @com.ocs.shared.businesslogic.contract.ContractType::valueOf(Ljava/lang/String;)(this.contractTypeDv); >>>>> >>>>> }-*/; >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> public final native void setContractTypeDv(ContractType v) /*-{ >>>>> this.contractTypeDv = (v == null) ? null : >>>>> [email protected]::name()(); }-*/; >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> public final native java.lang.Integer getPreferredEmployerId() /*-{ >>>>> >>>>> return (this.preferredEmployerId == null) ? null : >>>>> @java.lang.Integer::valueOf(I)(this.preferredEmployerId); >>>>> >>>>> }-*/; >>>>> public final native void setPreferredEmployerId(java.lang.Integer v) /*-{ >>>>> >>>>> this.preferredEmployerId = (v == null) ? null : >>>>> [email protected]::intValue()(); >>>>> >>>>> }-*/; >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In addition, if the DTO's contain arrays the client code has to access >>>>> them using the JsArray class rather than the java collection API. Do you >>>>> think there is some way to have a single representation using the new >>>>> Interop mechanism? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 3:13:55 AM UTC-4, Goktug Gokdogan wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> As we are getting close to 2.8 release I wrote a new document that is >>>>>> concentrating on jsinterop features to be released in 2.8: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/10fmlEYIHcyead_4R1S5wKGs1t2I7Fnp_PaNaa7XTEk0/edit# >>>>>> >>>>>> Please share your feedback. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Goktug >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/1155c295-ecd1-4cdd-86a2-ddf3cffb618c%40googlegroups.com >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/1155c295-ecd1-4cdd-86a2-ddf3cffb618c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected] >>> . >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/44c98d88-8d67-4f17-b942-4f7202aeac3b%40googlegroups.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/44c98d88-8d67-4f17-b942-4f7202aeac3b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/cd869b99-e7c5-4caa-b105-ce1e533ff8a8%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/cd869b99-e7c5-4caa-b105-ce1e533ff8a8%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA2B4gxBoTPUBeAvXBE6WkXzPwPCPnyp-hz-KqDw5JRPtQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
