I went through the issue tracker and curated the 2.8 mile stone. Currently we have 22 open issues: https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/milestones/2.8
I assigned all unassigned issues and asked clarifying questions, *please go through your assigned issues and respond to those questions*. If you feel that you have been wrongly assigned, please assign me back stating so. I'll try to make sure that the right person will start working on this. As for volunteers (to speed up 2.8), please go through the list and see if you want to help (just because something is assigned does not mean its getting worked on right now). *Come and ping me about work you want to do!* *As for adding more work to the 2.8 milestone:* At this state we want to ship, so anything that is not a critical bug fix (or is very trivial) will probably not get included. For the work that Jens mentioned, I'd say if these reviews make it before we cut RC1 they can go in otherwise I will hold them until after we have shipped 2.8.0. Also keep in mind that we need a green build before cutting RC1 in open source (and this only runs daily), so we should not be merging lots of patches at the last minute. -Daniel On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 8:28 PM Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:06:26 AM UTC+2, Daniel Kurka wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> in the last steering committee meeting we agreed that making the next >> version of Guava work (which contains a lot of Java8 usage) was the goal >> for RC1. >> >> We have gotten significantly closer to this now and I am happy to report >> that as of now we pass all of Guavas tests. >> However there are a few work items left to do: >> >> - Make sure we actually run all of the java8 tests in the open source >> build >> - Go through the github issue tracker and look for things missing for >> the 2.8 milestone >> - Discuss the fate of the Jettty upgrades (Google was not able to garden >> these in yet, so the are not really verified). >> - Anything else I might have missed? >> >> Do you guys have anything else to add to the list? >> > > I'd like to include https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/15161 in RC1 so > we have time to test it and possibly revert it or fix it before GA. > >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/ec6380bc-29ce-43c4-9b84-951ecc2e35fd%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/ec6380bc-29ce-43c4-9b84-951ecc2e35fd%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CALLujir-WOKaKhKe0yEYF%2Bc83oeC1rrD5-pWGgwEiavWSqr0Og%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
