Thanks guys. A note on this should certainly make it into the public JsInterop doc, somewhere close to the definition of the JsType/JsMethod/JsProperty contract.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:04 AM Jens <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jens is spot on. We want people to explicitly use >> -generateJsInteropExports if they rely on exporting since it has a hit on >> code size. >> > > Maybe the mention of the parameter should be added to the JsType JavaDoc > for a final 2.8 release. > > -- J. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/6ea6ad27-695d-4eec-8e0c-c2a49be9a422%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/6ea6ad27-695d-4eec-8e0c-c2a49be9a422%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- *BORIS BRUDNOY* Web Application Developer, Java/GWT Enthusiast (LinkedIn <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/borisbrudnoy>) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAD%3DgKQ0_A3T9i-6nn9rL5bFBC9SatO8rbYiY%2BWQ82arAQwmTsg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
