As I've mentioned elsewhere, https://plus.google.com/+JamesNelsonX/posts/gBfpBDnwV9V , java 9 support is entirely possible.
When I last tried it out, it required a fair number of hacks, but it worked fine. I expect the final version of java 9 modules to require slightly fewer hacks, and for it to take a fair amount of time to properly refactor gwt jars enough to be usable in java 9 systems. If you are in a rush to get java 9, you are going to have to roll up your sleeves, hold your nose, and dive into the early-access bug-zone. I can get you jars that (can be made to) work, but are very likely to change when integrated properly into Gwt (I did some unspeakable things to make it work the weekend I did it as my project). If you are comfortable waiting until there is more official support, I can't really tell you what Google is planning... I, however, will be releasing my fork w/ java 9 support when I am sure the underlying module system is completely done changing; a few colleagues and I are considering opening a gwt-shop with support for the 2.X line, and would handle this kind of stuff directly, however, it's still being done in my "spare" time, which is actually supposed to be for building a new ui templating language for gwt, coming up with an javax.model replacement for gwt generators, and building a social network to fix democracy... hehe. "Sleep is the Cousin of Death" :D -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/a685f645-1abb-4413-ae5c-e589d9dd643c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
