On Monday, December 11, 2017 at 9:39:52 PM UTC+1, Peter Donald wrote: > > Hi, > > Have you considered the javax.json API?
No, just like I didn't consider org.json. > There are some parts that may > not be able to be directly translated but from memory it should mostly > work. The "advantage" is that it is a standard that is starting to > gain traction and will likely be present in lots more APIs as more of > the EE stack adopts it. The "disadvantage" is that the api is a bit > more primitive and it evolves slowly. It could probably be done with > just @JsOverlay methods and a few adapter classes. I think it would mostly involve adapter classes (JsonObject extends Map, JsonArray extends List; so they cannot be implemented as native types) > Another > disadvantage is that it is an immutable/read-only API. > It's actually not: JsonObjectBuilder and JsonArrayBuilder allow constructing values. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/5dbdcd27-d141-4b07-935e-4ec5e994ddc1%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
