On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 11:11 AM Colin Alworth <[email protected]> wrote: > If I understand you, that is what I'm doing - I only the required 18 classes > (with some members removed so that I don't need more than that), and am just > seeking an opinion other than my own as to whether it is better to checked > them straight into gwt as com.google.gwt.thirdparty.ant... classes, or into a > standalone jar (to be clearer that this is external work+license, and have a > pointer to where that work originated).
If it was me, I would just pull the source in and place it in com.google.gwt.util.tools.zipscanner and flatten all the files into that package. No need to mark it as vendored as you never intend to pull from upstream again as they have moved in an incompatible direction. They are license compatible as both Apache-2.0 and as long as the GWT project does not have a policy against including code that is copyright to another organization in source tree then that seems like the easiest option going forward. -- Cheers, Peter Donald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CACiKNc5WRTMQHNRDxLgSJGUnfPfOfguLkfcvfVioDK4P%3DTAqdg%40mail.gmail.com.
