Agreed, I was testing to confirm this. It appears to not make a difference in the samples I have so far if that BOM includes the relocation though, but there are a lot of permutations to go through, I'm mostly automating the "easier" ones at this time.
-- Colin Alworth [email protected] On Sun, Jun 14, 2020, at 3:16 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > On Sunday, June 14, 2020 at 10:07:48 PM UTC+2, Colin Alworth wrote: >> Nice, I have something very similar. My main finding is putting relocation >> in the BOM doesn't work, unless you _also_ include the previous version's >> dependencyManagement tag, so that it tells the projects which include the >> BOM "please update c.g.g" instead of just "relocate to o.g, which will say >> please include o.g", as that will skip the c.g.g version bump. > > Indeed. > That's what I was suggesting in > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit-contributors/L2RMqglOEXo/fBGwNB2kCQAJ > “In addition to the relocation for gwt-dev and gwt-user (and other JARs), the > BOM (org.gwtproject:gwt) might then list both the org.gwtproject *and* the > "relocated" com.google.gwt.” > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/4f853f49-167b-4635-b185-9ae9d48948b5o%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/4f853f49-167b-4635-b185-9ae9d48948b5o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/153f88bc-b11c-4cd9-8049-b73940133df6%40www.fastmail.com.
