I don't see how using byte code would be any better than using source code, since the source code has just as much information. Maybe compiles could be made a little bit faster, but that's not a serious issue since reloads are so fast in hosted mode.
GWT probably couldn't generate fast JavaScript if it used Ruby instead of Java, because it wouldn't have the type information it needs for optimization. Issac On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Juan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > One of the good things about Microsoft Volta is that it uses the > bytecode, not the source code. This allows them to use any language. I > wonder why the GWT didn't follow this approach. Can you imagine > programming the front end using JRuby ? Sweeeeeet :) > > Best regards, > Juan > > > -- http://svwebbuilder.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
