It's not 'bits of code' it's the whole of both split panels. You can't subclass them.
2008/8/25 Jason Essington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Visibility is an important concept in java. It allows a developer to > cordon bits of code that are not meant to be accessed outside of the > current class (private) or an extending class (protected). This allows > a developer to "publish" a stable interface while preventing > implementation details from being artificially fixed. > > Now, if you have a very specific use case that requires access to > something with private visibility, there is a way to handle it. > Javascript has no concept of visibility, so you can use a JSNI method > to get around Java's private keyword. By doing this, you acknowledge > that you are accessing something that has no guarantee of actually > being there in a future release (that's why it was private) but it'll > allow you access where you really think you need it. > > This little trick is of course a technique of last resort, so it > should only be used if there is absolutely no other way to accomplish > your intended task. > > -jason > > > On Aug 25, 2008, at 8:53 AM, Rene wrote: > > > > > I just want to say hello to developers of gwt , and thank them for > > making my life harder :) . I want to extend HorizontalSplitPanel to > > get acces to Split element to get his width dinamicly for layout > > purposes , maybe its stupid then tell mi please why , but its > > functional anyway and with HorizontalSplitPanel impossible as its > > final. Can you please remove that keyword ? > > > > I know java has some keyword which can be used to protect access to > > classes so they are less vulnerable for attacks , is it applicable > > here in gwt in web context ? Library classes are meant for extending > > so why restrict programmers to use classes only way you meant them ? > > Its very limiting and man have to re implement thing already > > implemented in library just for one getter or so. > > > > Also f.e in Widget there are layoutData which can be very useful for > > me. And just for that i have to make wrapper around that class . I see > > source , its not closed source so why restricting that ? > > > > I would be wary glad if you in near future can little free that and > > other code. I can than make applications build on gwt smaller and > > quicker . > > > > joke: I have a tip which I use on my old code and so - open find and > > replace and remove all private and all final keywords. wala , code is > > clear , readable , and functional as before . Java don't need to be > > unreadable crap as rubist a pythonist think. > > > > Nice day > > > > > > > > > > -- Ian http://examples.roughian.com ___________________________________ Life is either a daring adventure or nothing. Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature. - Helen Keller ___________________________________ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
