I've implemented my own SerializableResponse class (practically a copy
of the one in TableModel)
Please, notice that I've added another List<R> list in this class
called rowObjects (the Response object has one called rowValues and
that's the one that is not being serialized, God knows why).
<pre>
public class GWTSerializableResponse<R extends Serializable> extends
Response<R> implements IsSerializable {
/**
* The 2D [EMAIL PROTECTED] Collection} of serializable cell data.
*/
private Collection<Collection<Serializable>> rows;
/*
* I'm going to include this List here, identically to Response
Object... shoulnd be necessary,
* If Response have one why should I implement my own?
*/
private List<R> rowObjects;
**
* Default constructor.
*/
public GWTSerializableResponse() {
this(null);
}
/**
* Constructor.
*
* @param rows the row data
*/
public
GWTSerializableResponse(Collection<Collection<Serializable>> rows) {
this(rows, null);
}
/**
* Constructor.
*
* @param rows the row data
* @param rowValues the values to associate with each row
*/
public
GWTSerializableResponse(Collection<Collection<Serializable>> rows,
List<R> rowValues) {
super(rowValues);
this.rows = rows;
}
@Override
public Iterator<Iterator<Object>> getIterator() {
if (rows == null) {
return null;
}
return new SerializableResponseIterator<Serializable>(rows);
}
public Long getTotalNumberOfElements() {
return totalNumberOfElements;
}
public void setTotalNumberOfElements(Long totalNumberOfElements) {
this.totalNumberOfElements = totalNumberOfElements;
}
public Integer getElementsPerPage() {
return elementsPerPage;
}
public void setElementsPerPage(Integer elementsPerPage) {
this.elementsPerPage = elementsPerPage;
}
public List<R> getRowObjects() {
return rowObjects;
}
public void setRowObjects(List<R> rowObjects) {
this.rowObjects = rowObjects;
}
</pre>
The SerializableResponseIterator object is identical to the one in
TableModel.
Now, If from server i set rowValues (in the constructor) and
rowObjects (with the setter) with exactly the same list, Only
rowObjects is != null in the client.... this is very disturbing.
Obviously I'm doing something nasty but I can't see what!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
