What is it that you find inconvenient about having two module definitions? How would a compiler option simplify things?
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:15 PM, sluramod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's what I do at the moment, however it is not very convenient. > > Alex > > On Oct 1, 5:27 am, "Isaac Truett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Having a production module and a development module isn't abnormal, as >> I understand it. You would configure the development module to inherit >> the production module and override any settings, such as linkers or >> user agent property, that apply only during development. Would that >> not meet your needs? >> >> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:12 AM, sluramod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> >> > I have some feedback for the developers. Please replace <add-linker >> > name="xs" /> with compiler switch. Or add XS support in hosted mode. >> > Without XS support in hosted mode it is hard to be productive. Unless >> > you know how to develop without having 2 identical modules: one with >> > <add-linker name="xs" /> and one without it. >> >> > Thanks, >> > Alex > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
