I think that Chris'  and Ian's solutions are already pretty mature, so
with some collaboration to get them to work together, we could have an
excellent system to use until the GWT team comes out with their
solution. I wouldn't be surprised if the GWT team ends up using a lot
of what you guys have worked on. I'll continue to provide feedback and
hopefully help out.

With regards to the validation system, I was wondering if it's
possible to use Hibernate's annotations. That way, I could perform
validation on the client side with your validation system and on the
server side with Hibernate's. Or can it be used with Hibernate on the
server side? I figured Hibernate would require it's own annotations in
order to run validation.

Regards,
Arthur Kalmenson

On Oct 8, 6:20 pm, "chris.ruffalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that we all need to collaborate in this regard.  My system
> looks hard but is really, really, really easy once you see what the
> ValidatorCreator is doing for the generator and all that.  I think you
> could create formulas for it if you wanted and modify objects in the
> Constraints themselves but it /seriously/ breaks the paradigm.
>
> In any case I really want to do something here and I think lately
> there has been a swell of support.  I'm thinking that this is
> something that GWT really needs to move on to the next level of ease
> of use and maturity.
>
> I'd throw my solution under a bus to get a better one, believe you
> me.
>
> In short:  I can't wait to see what you've got.
>
> On Oct 8, 3:52 pm, "Ian Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Chris,
>
> > I'm the guy that posted the data binding library that Ray Ryan was
> > referring 
> > here:http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors/browse...
>
> > I think your validation framework and my data binding framework might
> > benefit if we collaborated a bit.  I'm busy attending a funeral
> > between now and Sunday night, but I'd like to chat with you off-list
> > to see if we can co-operate.  There's also been some input from Arthur
> > Kalmenson, so we should probably include him.
>
> > Anyway, I just wanted to say that I'll be looking into your validation
> > code as soon as I can, but it may not be until after this weekend.
>
> > Thanks for sharing,
> > Ian
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to