Could you use png images instead ?
Playing with specials browser attributes is a tricky thing . Basically
it will multiply your work at least by 4 ( IE , Firefox , Safari , Opera ).
regards.
Thomas Wrobel a écrit :
> Cheers for the advice, I'll use those methods in future. :)
>
> 2008/10/13 Jason Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> As a rule of thumb, never setAttribute, when there is a property for that
>> element that does the same job. For example, use setClassName() instead of
>> setAttribute("class", ...), and getStyle().setProperty() instead of
>> setAttribute("style").
>>
>> IE has problems handing setAttribute with any "special" values. So even when
>> it
>> comes to setting the URL for an image, rather use the setSrc() method in
>> ImageElement.
>>
>> I wish someone had told me this earlier when I started coding JavaScript :P
>>
>> darkflame wrote:
>>
>>> That method worked, I wasnt aware of that method of doing it.
>>> Cheers! :)
>>>
>>> My own method, incidently, always worked in Firefox, and firebug
>>> simply showed "opacity: 0.65;" for the style, without the
>>> "alpha(opacity=65);" for IE present at all.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 13, 2:10 am, Paul Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What happens if you try:
>>>>
>>>> Style style = temp.getElement().getStyle();
>>>> style.setProperty("filter", "alpha(opacity=65)");
>>>> style.setProperty("opacity", "0.65");
>>>>
>>>> firebug will tell you what style is in force for each element
>>>>
>>>> HTH
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> darkflame wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to make a standard image have a code-dependant uniform
>>>>> transparency background, and for it to work across all browsers.
>>>>> Doing this in css is easy, and works, but GWT seems to not be having
>>>>> it.
>>>>> I'm using simply;
>>>>> temp.getElement().setAttribute("style", "filter: alpha(opacity=65);
>>>>> opacity: 0.65");
>>>>> Where temp is just an image.
>>>>> This doesn't seem to have any effect, but I'm not sure why.
>>>>> The same style code in CSS works, does it have to be different when
>>>>> applied this way? And what referance do I look at to see the changes
>>>>> made?
>>>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
