Switching to jetty would be fine we me and my colleagues as well. We use -noserver for hosted mode and unit testing (with some hackery).
On Oct 13, 5:48 pm, "Bruce Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > Hope you're enjoying 1.5. > > The GWT team has started putting together a 1.6 roadmap, which we'll publish > as soon as we have it nailed down. Two of the areas we want to work on for > 1.6 are some improvements to hosted mode startup time and a friendlier > output directory structure (something that looks more .war-like). > > As part of this effort, we've all but decided to switch the hosted mode > embedded HTTP server from Tomcat to Jetty. Would this break you? (And if so, > how mad would you be if we did it anyway?) We figure most people who really > care about the web.xml and so on are already using "-noserver" to have full > control over their server config. > > Thanks, > Bruce --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
