Yeah, I couldn't figure out a -whitelist that would work either, so am
now also doing -noserver.
I also had imagebundle issues, but didn't bother tracking it down, I
just copied everything over to the directory where my server serves
content.  Wow -noserver is slow.  Not sure if it's because I've copied
everything over, or what.  I don't have time yet to track this down.


On Oct 22, 9:52 am, JY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Same problem here. I had no luck with the whitelist parameter. Used
> the exact same parameters as Brian:- -whitelist "^http[:][/]
> [/]localhost[:]8080[/]" . Any suggestions?
>
> This forced me to use the -noserver option, but created yet another
> problem for me. In the -noserver mode, my ImageBundles do not work in
> hosted. I've started a thread here but no reply so 
> far:-http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/threa...
>
> On Oct 22, 7:59 am, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, and it was really handy that it did let them through, as IE also
> > lets the URLs through in web mode (if you've enabled it in IE's
> > internet options).  Great for testing.
>
> > I wasn't able to get a -whitelist option to work with 1.5.3 and hosted
> > mode. Here's what I'm using:
> > -whitelist "^http[:][/][/]localhost[:]8080[/]"
>
> > Any suggestions on the -whitelist to use to get the above posted code
> > to work in 1.5.3 hosted mode?
>
> > Thanks.
>
> > On Oct 21, 7:40 pm, "Sumit Chandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Hello again,
> > > As it turns out, the SOP warning message that hosted mode issues when 
> > > trying
> > > to make the request tohttp://localhost:8080/v1in1.5.3is an improvement
> > > over 1.5.2.
>
> > > The embedded Tomcat server in hosted mode is actually running on port 
> > > 8888,
> > > so a request to port 8080 does indeed violate SOP and should not be 
> > > allowed
> > > to go through. In 1.5.2, it seems that hosted mode was still allowing
> > > requests on different ports to go through, which is actually incorrect
> > > behaviour that looks to now be fixed in 1.5.3.
>
> > > Hope that helps,
> > > -Sumit Chandel
>
> > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Sumit Chandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > > > Hello everyone,
>
> > > > Hosted mode does indeed respect SOP so as to closely reflect what your
> > > > application would look like running in a deployed environment as you
> > > > debug. You can pass in a -whitelist for specific cross-site URLs that
> > > > you want to communicate with, but that should only be used for quick
> > > > debug cycles to make sure that SOP problems aren't something that you
> > > > forget about and get stuck on at the web mode testing or production
> > > > stage.
>
> > > > That said, Brian's code snippet doesn't seem to suggest to be making a
> > > > cross-site request, and so should work. I'm trying to reproduce this
> > > > now to figure out what's going on.
>
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -Sumit Chandel
>
> > > > On Oct 21, 8:08 am, Alex Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I hope someone can clarify this. I thought Hosted Mode did have the
> > > > > SOP restriction and I'm pretty sure I did some testing with
> > > > > RequestBuilder in 1.5.1 or 1.5.2 and saw the SOP restrictions. Being
> > > > > new to GWT I thought this was just by design.  I sure would be
> > > > > convenient if hosted mode did not obey the SOP!
>
> > > > > Alex
>
> > > > > On Oct 21, 8:36 am, JY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > I'm hitting the same problem with 1.5.3 as well. Now, I'm forced to
> > > > > > use the -noserver mode. I hope that same policy origin check can be
> > > > > > removed from the latest build.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to