WebDude, It's only a warning. It will not prevent your application from running correctly, as far as I can tell so far.
Walden On Oct 31, 8:04 am, walden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ian, > > I'm confused by your statement "coming from server-side code". That's > a compile warning against a serializable (shared) class. I have a > similar artifact in my project right now. It happens to be caused by > a defined type X that extends HashMap<String,String>. It seems as if > the compiler is inspecting the OrderedConstantSet, something never > referenced in the application, only because it is also a > Map<String,String>. I would like to understand if this is necessary > or a bug in the compiler. > > Thanks, > > Walden > > On Oct 31, 7:10 am, "Ian Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:38 PM, WebDude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If I leave out the "stringMap" member, I do not get the warning. Is > > > this a warning I need to worry about? > > > The warning is coming from your server-side code, not the definition > > of your transfer object. Can you show us what you're sending back to > > the client? What kind of instance are you putting in stringMap? > > > Ian- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
