and don't forget, it adds one more thing to remember to add to your development classpath, which would likely generate a bunch more questions on the list about "why won't my application compile"
-jason On Nov 4, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Isaac Truett wrote: > > True. And it gives the rest of us a new gwt-foo.jar to bother with and > still leaves open the possibility for people to mistakenly deploy > gwt-foo.jar. > > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Jason Essington > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> It would allow people to mistakenly deploy the gwt-user.jar rather >> than the correct lib (gwt-servlet.jar) in their web applications. >> >> -jason >> >> >> On Nov 3, 2008, at 5:51 PM, Isaac Truett wrote: >> >>> >>> What would that accomplish? >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Joshua Partogi >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I think I understand where this questions leads us. He's asking why >>>> doesn't GWT distribution just put the servlet API in a separate jar >>>> instead of bundling it inside gwt-user.jar :-) >>>> >>>> On Nov 4, 8:37 am, Jason Essington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> you shouldn't be deploying gwt-user.jar, but rather gwt- >>>>> servlet.jar ... it omits all of the stuff required for >>>>> development, >>>>> but undesirable in deployment. >>>>> >>>>> -jason >>>>> On Nov 3, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Harsha wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> When we deploy the webapplication with gwt-user.jar to JBoss, we >>>>>> are >>>>>> getting offended error. Is there any reason, why servlet api's >>>>>> are >>>>>> included with in the jar file? >>>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
