Sorry not Ken, Issac :) I was reading some article about a guy called Ken. My bad !!!
On Nov 10, 5:02 pm, Suri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ken, > I was following that and then as shown in the link there for setting > up for eclipse: > " 1.Follow the instructions here to set up your eclipse environment. > " > > I downloaded the readme file from the link. And while following that, > Around Line 104 in the file you'll see that it mentions instructions > to download GWT core projects. > This is where I became hesistant to continue. Also from the > instructions in setting up Eclipse: > > "4 If you not on Windows, you will need to fix the gwt-dev project > reference > > 1. Right click on the new incubator project in the explorer and > choose Properties > 2. Java Build Path > 3. Under the Projects tab, replace gwt-dev-windows as appropriate " > > Isn't that again talking about using the gwt-dev-windows project and > not jar? > > But if what you say is true and all I need is the GWT Tools section > (By section I again presume you are talking about the GWT tools > project which is mentioned to be checked out from SVN in the beginning > of the Making Incubator Better page), then would it be as simple as > > 1) Setting the GWT_ROOT (to GWT incubator ) > 2) Setting the GWT_TOOLs (to GWT Tools) > 3) JDK_HOME > > And then finally running my ant? > > Thanks for the patience. > > Suri > > On Nov 10, 4:48 pm, "Isaac Truett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I hope I'm not wrong in my observations? > > > No, you're absolutely right. The gen2 widgets are new and did not > > exist in the last Incubator release. > > > > what concerns me was the additional > > > projects that I really have no idea about that I'm having to download > > > to get the incubator compiled. > > > Are you following the instructions in the Making Incubator Better > > section of the wiki (link below)? The only other download you should > > need is the tools section of the main GWT project, which has libraries > > required to build GWT and the Incubator. > > >http://code.google.com/docreader/#p=google-web-toolkit-incubator&s=go... > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:34 PM,Suri<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Issac, > > > Thanks for the info. I did actually go ahead and download that jar a > > > few days ago. However, that seems to be a different version from what > > > is available in the trunk. It seems to be all 1.x version as opposed > > > to the gen2 stuff. For example, I had gone through the sample for the > > > PagingScrollTableDemo from the code I had checked out from the SVN, > > > and then wanted to start using the idea in my own code. The very first > > > import of the FlexTable which in the SVN version is referenced as: > > > > import com.google.gwt.gen2.table.override.client.FlexTable; > > > > actually turns out to be in the > > > > import com.google.gwt.widgetideas.table.client.overrides.FlexTable; > > > > I hope I'm not wrong in my observations? > > > > Thanks for any input. Additionally, I don't mind building from the > > > trunk for incubator, however what concerns me was the additional > > > projects that I really have no idea about that I'm having to download > > > to get the incubator compiled. For now, lets say I did actually > > > continue with the september version of the jar, I was ideally hoping > > > to use the gen2 code because I think that's where the improved > > > PagingScrollTable lies correct? > > > >Suri > > > > On Nov 10, 3:37 pm, "Isaac Truett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Suri, > > > >> You do not need to download the GWT project and build it from trunk in > > >> order to build the Incubator. > > > >> If you prefer an older Incubator build, you can download one here: > > > >>http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/downloads/list > > > >> Please keep in mind that the most recent build currently available is > > >> from September. The Incubator classes evolve quickly; I always > > >> recommend building from trunk so that you can get the latest updates. > > > >> - Isaac > > > >> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:21 PM,Suri<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > Hi Issac > > >> > I'm trying to set up the GWT Incubator project. Do I need to have the > > >> > GWT source code checked out as well? > > >> > All I'd like really is the incubator jar file. Isn't there any other > > >> > way of obtaining that other than checking out the GWT core source/ GWT > > >> > Tools source/ GWT incubator source and building all together? > > > >> > Thanks for any input. > > > >> >Suri > > > >> > On Nov 5, 10:17 am, "Isaac Truett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> >>Suri, > > > >> >> There's a demo in the Incubator that you could look at. The code for > > >> >> it can be viewed online or you can download and setup the Incubator > > >> >> project locally (be sure to grab GWT 1.5.3 if you don't already have > > >> >> it). Links below. > > > >> >> Incubator SVN > > >> >> -http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/source/checkout > > >> >> PagingScrollTableDemo > > >> >> -http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/source/browse/t... > > >> >> GWT 1.5.3 download > > >> >> -http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list > > > >> >> Hope that helps. > > > >> >> - Isaac > > > >> >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:05 AM,Suri<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> >> > Hi Issac, > > >> >> > Since I'm still at a design level choosing my options, can I get a > > >> >> > sample code for the PagingScrollTable to be able to evaluate its use > > >> >> > for my purpose? I tried looking at the wiki for the incubator and > > >> >> > all > > >> >> > there was was a definition for some bean. > > > >> >> > Thanks > > >> >> >Suri > > > >> >> > On Nov 5, 2:44 am, "alex.d" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> >> >> Well, i started with trying to use 1.4 Table with 1.5 RCx GWT and > > >> >> >> encountered numerous problems while trying to compile the example > > >> >> >> on > > >> >> >> the page. After solving all the issues i finaly managed to get it > > >> >> >> to > > >> >> >> work, but it didn't play nice in my prety complex GUI layout with a > > >> >> >> lot of Panels: size and visibility issues. In comparison to it, a > > >> >> >> Ext > > >> >> >> GWT table was a half an hour work and it works prety stable. > > >> >> >> Basicaly > > >> >> >> you can see all my issues when you look at the comments on the > > >> >> >> incubator page. I didn't report the issues because people did it > > >> >> >> before me and the was no response to it, and because the project > > >> >> >> seemed to be dead - no updates in months(but that was severall > > >> >> >> weeks > > >> >> >> ago). > > > >> >> >> On 4 Nov., 21:13, "Isaac Truett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> >> >> > > Bugs, bugs and one more time bugs. > > > >> >> >> > Alex, > > > >> >> >> > What problems did you encounter with PagingScrollTable? Have you > > >> >> >> > entered them into the issue tracker? > > > >> >> >> > - Isaac > > > >> >> >> > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:53 AM, alex.d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> >> >> > > On 3 Nov., 15:30,Suri<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> >> >> > >> Hi Alex, > > >> >> >> > >> Well here are my concerns on both areas but before I get to > > >> >> >> > >> that I'd > > >> >> >> > >> like to mention that I'm developing I guess a relatively > > >> >> >> > >> small module > > >> >> >> > >> but something I think is complex in terms of the amount of > > >> >> >> > >> functionality its providing. The idea is to have a table of > > >> >> >> > >> data that > > >> >> >> > >> is retrieved from the server and displayed to the user > > > >> >> >> > >> 1) The data should be sortable/pageable > > >> >> >> > >> 2) When the user clicks on a cell/row: > > >> >> >> > >> - the row gets highlighted > > >> >> >> > >> - the info of that row shall appear in a "editable" row > > >> >> >> > >> below the > > >> >> >> > >> table where once the user makes and changes, these are > > >> >> >> > >> reflected in > > >> >> >> > >> the main table > > >> >> >> > >> - once the user navigates to another row, the edited row > > >> >> >> > >> should > > >> >> >> > >> have some sort of marker displaying that it is dirty until > > >> >> >> > >> the save > > >> >> >> > >> button is clicked ( this is allowing for batch processing) > > >> >> >> > >> - thus when a user decides to sort/page this information > > >> >> >> > >> would need > > >> >> >> > >> to be retained until the user saves. > > >> >> >> > >> 3) The user has a drop down above the table to filter by a > > >> >> >> > >> couple of > > >> >> >> > >> the columns. > > >> >> >> > > So far not a problem with both of them. > > > >> >> >> > >> I looked at ext-GWT and GWT-ext. Both seem are somewhat ok > > >> >> >> > >> about this, > > >> >> >> > >> however with ext-GWT > > >> >> >> > >> - You can't paginate/sort on the client side if I'm not wrong > > >> >> >> > >> and the > > >> >> >> > >> whole model seems to force you to do remote pagination which > > >> >> >> > >> from what > > >> >> >> > >> I saw, would basically reset the data each time - so not a > > >> >> >> > >> good option > > >> >> >> > > You can sort on the client side - it's per default that way if > > >> >> >> > > you > > >> >> >> > > want to sort only the current page - in case you want to sort > > >> >> >> > > the > > >> >> >> > > whole data and then have a page Nr. N, you will have to > > >> >> >> > > sort/page on > > >> >> >> > > the server. New grid supports editing directly in the cells(so > > >> >> >> > > no page > > >> >> >> > > refresh necessary). But i haven't used it yet. > > > >> >> >> > >> And with GWT-ext: > > >> >> >> > >> I tried implementing it however, ran into some memory > > >> >> >> > >> overflow problem > > >> >> >> > >> when trying to compile it. Plus, there was a file > > >> >> >> > >> PagingMemoryProxy > > >> >> >> > >> that was not available in the GWT-ext library but then I > > >> >> >> > >> later found > > >> >> >> > >> it in the gwtux library. Not sure why it is like that. > > >> >> >> > > I do not use GWT-ext. The whole javascript-wrapper concept > > >> >> >> > > isn't the > > >> >> >> > > best idea imho. > > > >> >> >> > >> On the whole the problem with both ideas is that, I thought > > >> >> >> > >> of them > > >> >> >> > >> more as widgets but turns out they almost completely take > > >> >> >> > >> over your > > >> >> >> > >> code with a whole bunch of different things to do as opposed > > >> >> >> > >> to > > >> >> >> > >> standard GWT code. So, that isn't really an attractive idea. > > >> >> >> > > Well, i found out that writting smth. as complex as Ext-GWT's > > >> >> >> > > grid > > >> >> >> > > would take too much time and effort - can't really afford it > > >> >> >> > > in my > > ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
