The selection scripts do make  use of document.write(), which I don't
believe will work properly after the document is loaded.   Do you
think that would explain what you are seeing?

On Dec 11, 3:56 pm, Raziel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Using GWT 1.5.3:
>
> According to the documentation, "In the GWT 1.4 bootstrap model, GWT
> expects to find all its files in the same path as the
> <module>.nocache.js file.". Thus, having the host HTML file 
> athttp://host.domain.tld/myApp/index.html, and the <module>.nocache.js
> and other files generated by the GWT compiler in other location.
>
> It all works fine for me when I use the script tag. However, in my
> application I mostly use a JS function to load scripts dynamically.
> This function uses XmlHttpRequest to grab the script content, and then
> performs an eval on it. In this case it loads the <module>.nocache.js
> successfully, BUT the script then tries to look for the other
> resources under the location/URL that loaded the host page -which in
> simple cases could be the location of the host page, but others (for
> example when the host page is included in other page, or it's
> retrieved through an struts action) could be something completely
> different, for which there's not even a physical location.
>
> In some other scenarios, when the host page is part of a deeper
> nesting of imported pages, the <module>.nocache.js is imported
> properly but fails when executed, claiming that
> com_sample_MyGWTApplication is undefined when executing the following
> line: com_sample_MyGWTApplication.onInjectionDone
> ('com.sample.MyGWTApplication')
>
> I know that it might be my fault, and might be pushing the technology
> beyond it's confort zone. However one of the things that appealed to
> me to finally use it was the fact that didn;t claim to "marry"
> entirely to it. The problem is that I don;t know what kind of contract
> I'm breaking with GWT. The documentations says simply include the JS
> file and done, magic! I know nothing is magic, but is there a clearer
> document that establishes the contract to properly use GWT? Has
> somebody any idea of what could be happening in my case?
>
> Thanks
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to