The more code I implement and the more event-related APIs
I look at in GWT, the more confused I get.  After
looking at complete examples about 'listeners' on website such as:
http://examples.roughian.com/index.htm#Listeners~Summary
or posts in this group, I conclude that the most general
is an 'EventListener', because then I can get at ANY/ALL events
that I might be interested in, as it's method gets 'Event e'
as an input param.  But, what seems to me like
a real NEGATIVE is that I must 'extend' (sub-class) an object
to use EventListener, right?

Now, if I only care about a 'click', then I do NOT need to extend,
because there are 'clicklisteners', which listen for just ONE event
type...'click'.  But, if I want, say, 'double-click', well, there
are NOT any 'double-click' listeners, so it seems that I'll need
to use the more general EventListener.

That would be reasonable/acceptable if there was just
ONE object that I wanted/needed to extend in a given app.
But, let's say, I care about 'doubleclicks' from 3 different
objects in the same app...anchors, tabs, and images.
(Maybe not the best examples, but bear with me.)
So, it seems that now I need to extend three objects, so I'll
need 3 java classes (and thus, ...3 FILES...one class per file).
[Some posts/examples mention 'widget builders'  as a separate
class of developer.  But, I don't want to build new 'widgets'...
I just want a write a simple app.

Somehow, the APIs seem to be making things unnecessarily 'complex',
when I compare this to how easy it was to implement events
in javascript language (before I started using GWT).  And, its
beginning to seem like the designers of the event-model/event-apis in
GWT
might have miss-designed the APIs?!  (I wasn't around at the
beginning, so I don't know how the event-APIs looked in version 1.00.)

Both the author of roughian website and other posters all seem to
bemoan
this need to extend, but all say it is necessary.  For example,
roughian
says:

[Notes:
This is something you should only use if you are subclassing a widget
- it's not much use otherwise,
you can't addEventListener() to anything I'm aware of.
So, as a builder of widgets, you'd use this to pick up events and use
them in ways
that you can't do with the ordinarily supported event interfaces]

Clearly, I (and others?) must all be missing something.  Where have I
gone wrong?

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to