Great, that is mostly what I expected, thanks for the help! On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Shawn Pearce <[email protected]> wrote: > There isn't really any effect either way. The additional module might take > a tiny bit extra time to compile (like under 1 ms) due to the compiler > needing to read an extra XML file. But all of the code from all modules is > flattened out at compile time into a single JavaScript file. So there is no > runtime impact to using multiple modules vs. one module, and there really > isn't a compile time impact that you can notice as a developer. > > Generally people try to organize code into modules where there is > reusability. Then its easier to reuse code from one project in another by > just inheriting from the necessary modules. Its GWT's way of managing > libraries.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
