On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Ed Bras <[email protected]> wrote:
> Where can I find the new scheme details ? > I don't - I haven't found any. The page you posted is the most authoritative page but it refers to the old scheme (#!, ?_escaped_fragment) and I can't tell with certainty what stays true for the new scheme. > So I am thinking about using #! instead of # and see what happens, or > using the History.pushState() (I not support IE 9 anyway), as I get the > idea that these url's (created with the pushState()), can be indexed by > Google. But I am not sure. > I don't know about pushState(). I am using GWT History.newItem(). Looks like pushState() requires some reading from my part :-). > What do you think? Are your ur's with the # fragment indexed by Google? > > The point is: I am not sure. I switched to #! from # and I can't go back because the old scheme with _escaped_fragment_ is honored from LinkedIn, Google+, Facebook, Twitter and Bing so I will support nevermind what google does. FYI google crawls my pages both new style and old style - but my pages have #! If I find anything new I will post it here. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
