Hello,
I tried the following code:
@JsType(namespace=JsPackage.GLOBAL, isNative=true)
public class Array {
public native int push(int element);
public native int push(int element, int element2);
public native int push(String element);
public native int pop();
}
private native int[] initTest() /*-{
return [1,2,3,4];
}-*/;
private native Array castArray(int[] arr) /*-{
return arr;
}-*/;
public void onModuleLoad() {
int[] ar = initTest();
Array jsArray = castArray(ar); // Do I really need a second variable
here ?
jsArray.push(10); // Works
jsArray.push(15, 16); // Overload works !!
jsArray.push("abc"); // Works ??
int x1 = jsArray.pop(); // Works (x1 has value "abc") ???
int x2 = jsArray.pop(); // Works
int x3 = ar[4]; // Works (x3 == 10)
int x = x1 + x2 + x3; // Works (x = "abc1610")
...
a. I wonder if there is a simpler method of treating JS arrays without the
need of having two variables pointing to them. I tried to use an overlay
method in Array class but without any luck.
b. Although lack of checks in castings is often convenient while working
with JsInterop, it could be helpful if there was a separate type/class
(e.g. JsValue) accepting values of any JS type (including primitives) and
providing casting methods to the other types with debugging time checks
(asserts). This way a better balance between flexibility and strong casting
could be achieved.
Regards,
Elias
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
