The problem with GWT has always been misconceptions and lack of
informations.
While the GWT project homepage has improved a lot. it still super difficult
to  find the right informations.

I remember my first meeting with customers when I said "what about writing
this entire thing in Java with GWT ?  "
The answer was "No way we will use applets here. Are you mad ? "
 Then I always have to answer Question like "what if there is a problem
with the generated JavaScript code ? Can I have a look ? Do we even need to
have a look ? "

When I said "You want to target web, mobile web, native mobile and desktop
from one code base ? GWT is the way to go"  They look at me like I m crazy.

Other problem is showcases.
People are building great products, libraries but it s hard to find it.
I mean products like animatron.com should be right at the first page of the
GWT project home page.

I mean look at the JS community. For every single little thing they do
their advertise it like crazy.
You almost think Angular JS invented two way databindig :).

Off course the argument is always "It s opensouce. Just contribuate it".

Miss the days where there was a real developer advocate for GWT at Google
(David :) ).

On 20 January 2016 at 10:09, Stefan Bylund <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Google's web crawler (Googlebot) has improved substantially lately when it
> comes to crawling dynamic HTML pages generated with JavaScript. It does not
> simply crawl the initial HTML page but executes any JavaScript and then
> crawls the resulting HTML page. You don't have to do the cumbersome
> hashbang (escaped fragments) workaround any more. I have not had any
> problems with indexing GWT web apps with Google's web crawler. See this
> article for more info:
>
>
> http://searchengineland.com/tested-googlebot-crawls-javascript-heres-learned-220157
>
> However, I think that Bing's web crawler still have problems with indexing
> dynamic HTML pages generated with JavaScript. But with Google's market
> share I don't see that as a problem.
>
> /Stefan
>
>
> Den onsdag 20 januari 2016 kl. 06:35:30 UTC+1 skrev Adolfo Rodriguez:
>>
>> Hi, the title is provocative. I wanted to ask 2 questions in the same
>> thread. I love GWT, no doubt is the framework that delivers higher
>> productivity. But I quit using it 2 years ago because google robots where
>> not able to properly index my pages despite I implemented the escaped
>> fragment specs
>> <https://developers.google.com/webmasters/ajax-crawling/docs/specification>.
>> Disappointing.
>>
>> On the other hand, I would expect much more traction in a Java framework
>> than can combine presentation (Bootstrap) with presentation login (any JS
>> libraries) and server side. But barely you can see job openings in the
>> market demanding GWT. Even, the last message in this list is 40 days old.
>>
>> So, I want to raise the question:
>>
>> * what is stopping GWT against other frameworks? Is the problem with
>> crawlers?
>>
>> * what i the current status of crawler, HTML generation and search engine
>> robots?
>>
>> I have a mixed feeling with GWT, I love it... but my experience says that
>> I should not use it.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GWT Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 

Alain Ekambi

Co-Founder

Ahomé Innovation Technologies

http://www.ahome-it.com/ <http://ahome-it.com/>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to