Somebody has to do it! :P

#gwtisback

On Monday, 29 February 2016 01:19:36 UTC+1, Alain wrote:
>
> "And GWT is such an awesome technology I am simply no getting why it's so 
> underused.."
>
> Advertissement :)
>
> On 29 February 2016 at 01:02, Stefan Falk <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Well, as for me I am willing to do almost *anything* just for the sake of 
>> not having to write too many JavaScript lines :D
>>
>> And GWT is such an awesome technology I am simply no getting why it's so 
>> underused..
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, 28 February 2016 23:15:17 UTC+1, Ed wrote:
>>>
>>> @Stefan
>>> Totally Agree there are some points of concern.
>>>
>>> I am so used to doing things the "hard" way that I am immune to the 
>>> pitfalls.
>>>
>>> At the end of the day Eclipse give me what I need for my particular use 
>>> case.
>>>
>>> I usually do not use the build in server and deploy to jetty/tomcat 
>>> instances for testing.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Stefan Falk <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @Ed: Don't get me wrong. I like Eclipse and I am basically an 
>>>> Eclipse-only developer. I would use it to brew coffee if there was a plug 
>>>> in. :D
>>>>
>>>> What I'm just missing are some basic support e.g. if I use GWTP I want 
>>>> to see some generated code. Java/GWT has some boilerplate code that could 
>>>> be generated.
>>>>
>>>> Another thing that annoys me is that @UiField thing. Sometimes it's 
>>>> really annoying to keep all the field names up-to-date. Renaming stuff is 
>>>> sometimes a but nasty.
>>>>
>>>> Then there's the thing with the code server.. I'd really appreciate a 
>>>> better view for the error messages that one gets there. You always have to 
>>>> search for the actual line that points out what's wrong instead of seeing 
>>>> that message in the Eclipse "Markers" view or something.
>>>>
>>>> One more thing that I miss is a better Project Explorer. The files are 
>>>> sorted by type and that means you get A.java B.java A.ui.xml B.ui.xml 
>>>> instead of A.java A.ui.xml B.java B.ui.xml. 
>>>>
>>>> Since I am using gwt-maven-archetypes I even have to kill the Code 
>>>> Server by hand - I cannot use the Eclipse "Debug" or "Server" view for 
>>>> that. 
>>>>
>>>> Maybe some of that stuff could be avoided or changed but it's not 
>>>> supported out of the box by Eclipse afaik.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> @Gilberto: Yes, that's actually a good point. The plugins can be 
>>>> sometimes a bit messy. 
>>>>
>>>> @Rogelio: What kind of support are we talking here? It happens that I 
>>>> might have access to the Ultimate edition for free as a student.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, 27 February 2016 22:54:35 UTC+1, Rogelio Flores wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I find IntelliJ to be superior to eclipse, not only in its out of the 
>>>>> box (for the Ultimate edition--not free) support for GWT, but for almost 
>>>>> everything else. I was too an eclipse user for many years so I know the 
>>>>> difference.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 8:13:56 AM UTC-7, Gilberto wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's get real for a moment: Eclipse is a plug-in hell.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you ever try to run a multi-module App Engine project with multi 
>>>>>> module GWT app, configured with Maven? Don't even try, go to the command 
>>>>>> line and run the server from there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sometimes you lose days of work just setting up the environment. And 
>>>>>> that sucks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But, I still use it. I prefer how Eclipse deal with git and how it's 
>>>>>> code completion works (ctrl+space for everything, instead of a different 
>>>>>> shortcut for each type of code completion, like on IntelliJ). It's a 
>>>>>> matter 
>>>>>> of knowing what is possible and what is not inside the IDE, and which 
>>>>>> combination of plug-ins (and its versions) works for your project, and 
>>>>>> which don't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have some friends that love IntelliJ and would never go back to 
>>>>>> Eclipse again. In my opinion, if you aren't crazy yet because of the 
>>>>>> plug-in hell, Eclipse can still do a good job. Like Ed said, it's the 
>>>>>> best 
>>>>>> free IDE available.
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "GWT Users" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "GWT Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Alain Ekambi
>
> Co-Founder
>
> Ahomé Innovation Technologies
>
> http://www.ahome-it.com/ <http://ahome-it.com/>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to